UMH - FINAL MASTER'S PROJECT

FINAL MASTER'S PROJECT

Course

Code: 637

Degree: Master's in Clinical Medicine Research

Faculty of Medicine

Year: Year 1 of Master's in Clinical Medicine Research

Semester: Spring

Type: Final Master's Proj.

Language: Spanish

ECTS credits: 18

Lecture: 18

Laboratory: 0

Hours: 450

Directed: 0

Shared: 180

Autonomous: 270

Subject matter: Final Master's Project

Module: Final master's project

Degree website

Course instructors are responsible for the course content descriptions in English.

Description

The Department of Clinical Medicine will define at the time of the call of this master's the possible lines and projects that can be carried out on a voluntary basis by students enrolled in the program.

Faculty

Name	Coordinator	Lecture	Laboratory
FERNÁNDEZ SÁNCHEZ, FRANCISCO JAVIER	■	■	■
ANDRES COLLADO, MARIANO NICOLAS		■	■
CLIMENT PAYA, VICENTE EDUARDO		■	■
BAÑULS ROCA, JOSE		■	■
NAVARRO RUIZ, ANDRES		■	■
FERNANDEZ ABELLAN, PASCUAL		■	■
MASIA CANUTO, MARIA DEL MAR		■	■
QUESADA RICO, JOSE ANTONIO		■	■
SANCHEZ PEREZ, ROSA MARIA		■	■
BELLOT GARCIA, PABLO		■	■
POVEDA PAGAN, EMILIO JOSE		■	■
MORENO PEREZ, OSCAR		■	■
CLIMENT GRANA, EDUARDO		■	■
MAS SERRANO, PATRICIO		■	■
SALAS LUCIA, FEDERICO		■	■
VAREA MORCILLO, MONTSERRAT		■	■
LOPEZ PINTOR, ELSA		■	■
FLORES PARDO, EMILIO		■	■
SANCHEZ MARTINEZ, M ROSARIO		■	■
MARTINEZ MARTINEZ, JUAN GABRIEL		■	■
MERINO DE LUCAS, ESPERANZA		■	■
DIAZ MARIN, CARMEN		■	■
REUS BAÑULS, SERGIO JAVIER		■	■
SEMPERE SELVA, MARIA TERESA		■	■
BELINCHON ROMERO, ISABEL		■	■
JAIME SANCHEZ, FRANCISCO ANGEL		■	■
GARCIA FERNANDEZ, LORENA		■	■
BOIX MARTINEZ, VICENTE		■	■
RAMOS RINCON, JOSE MANUEL		■	■
HERNANDEZ BLASCO, LUIS MANUEL		■	■
SORIANO GOMIS, VICTOR		■	■
GONZALEZ DE DIOS, FRANCISCO JAVIER		■	■
SERRANO GARCIA, RICARDO		■	■
SEVERA FERRANDIZ, GUILLERMO		■	■
FUSTER RUIZ DE APODACA, ROSA		■	■
VELA CASASEMPERE, CARMEN PALOMA		■	■
ARRARTE ESTEBAN, VICENTE IGNACIO		■	■
BERNAL MORELL, ENRIQUE		■	■
GARCIA CANTO, EVA MARIA		■	■
PARKER , LUCY ANNE		■	■
GONZALEZ DELGADO, MARIA PURIFICACION		■	■
RODRIGUEZ DIAZ, JUAN CARLOS		■	■
JOVER MARTINEZ, RODRIGO JOAQUIN		■	■
PEREZ SEMPERE, ANGEL CONSTANTINO		■	■
GUTIERREZ CASBAS, ANA		■	■
DE MIGUEL BALSA, EVA MARIA		■	■
LOZANO PALENCIA, MARIA TERESA		■	■
PADROS FLORES, NURIA		■	■
DE LIZAUR DE UTRILLA, ALEJANDRO		■	■
MARTINEZ RUBIO, MARIA MAGDALENA		■	■
GARCIA PACHON, EDUARDO		■	■
RUIZ NODAR, JUAN MIGUEL		■	■
ESTEBAN RODRIGUEZ, ANGEL		■	■
LLENAS GARCIA, JARA		■	■
CAPARROS CAYUELA, ESTHER		■	■
LUMBRERAS LACARRA, BLANCA JUANA		■	■
PADILLA URREA, SERGIO		■	■
RODRIGUEZ LESCURE, ALVARO		■	■
PORTILLA SOGORB, JOAQUIN		■	■
CANOVAS ROBLES, JOSE		■	■
CORTES CASTELL, ERNESTO		■	■
PICO ALFONSO, ANTONIO MIGUEL		■	■
AUSO MONREAL, EVA		■	■
SEGUI RIPOLL, JOSE MIGUEL		■	■
FRANCES GUARINOS, RUBEN JOSE		■	■
MARTINEZ ESCORIZA, JUAN CARLOS		■	■
BETLLOCH MAS, MARIA ISABEL		■	■
PASCUAL PEREZ, MARIA DE LOS REYES		■	■
JUSTE RUIZ, MERCEDES		■	■
JIMENEZ MORENO, MARIA SUSANA		■	■
MARCO VERA, PASCUAL		■	■
PERIS GARCIA, JUAN JORGE		■	■
GARCIA HONRUBIA, ANTONIO		■	■
BERTOMEU GONZALEZ, VICENTE		■	■
AHUMADA VIDAL, MIGUEL		■	■
DE MADARIA PASCUAL, ENRIQUE		■	■

Competencies and learning outcomes

General competencies

Demonstrate systematic competence in the field of medicine, and mastery of the research skills and methods associated with that field.
Contribute with original research that extends the frontiers of knowledge by developing a substantial body that merits referenced national or international publication.
Know how to communicate with peers, the academic community as a whole, and society in general about their areas of expertise.
Be able to promote, within academic and professional contexts, technological, social, or cultural advancement in a society based on knowledge.

Specific competencies

Access scientific literature, databases, documentary sources, and high-level information existing about clinical medicine and related areas.
Design and plan a project that addresses the problem to research to be submitted for evaluation by ethics committees, as well as by research evaluation committees and research funding committees.
Compile, sort, and classify research data and material, whether in the form of documents, medical records, questionnaires, experimental test results, etc.
Communicate results and disseminate the knowledge generated to health care professionals, as well as non-specialized audiences, using written, oral, and graphic means.
Perform critical readings of works, articles, or projects that use health questionnaires or scales, determining their proper use.
Handle with ease and on an expert level the most important information search tools available today in health sciences, from commercial databases to different types of search tools available on the Internet.
Attain the knowledge and abilities necessary for preparing and presenting R&D project financing requests in addition to the dissemination of results thereof.
Ability to inform, educate, monitor, and maintain effective communication (including the use of technology) with patients, family members, and social groups, including those with communication difficulties.

Objectives (Learning outcomes)

Achieve the knowledge and skills needed to carry out the development and presentation of a research project, applying all the knowledge acquired in the previous subjects studied throughout the Master's Degree.

Teaching units

This course does not have teaching units to make the TFM, which is the compendium of all subjects of the Master.

Methodology and grading

Methodology

Lecture: Pass on knowledge and activate cognitive processes in students, encouraging their participation.
Project-based learning: Realization of a project to solve a problem, applying acquired learning and promoting abilities related to planning, design, performing activities, and reaching conclusions.

Grading

For the ASSESSMENT of the TFM there will be a court that will evaluate the projects and the presentation of students IN-PERSON at the Faculty of Medicine of UMH on 2 calls, June and September. The Secretary shall notify each student the place, the day and time for the defense, at least with a week in advance, and will make public the full schedule of defenses.
The defense of the TFM will be public, unless in the presence of the rest of the students of the specific turn. Students will enter in the room of Defense before the exhibition, in order not to interfere in the presentations of other students and in the assessment of the court.
The TFM can only be evaluated once the student has passed the remaining materials of the Master's degree and have, therefore, of all the necessary credits to obtain the master's degree, with the exception of those corresponding to the own TFM.

For the evaluation of the TFM, it will take into account:
-On behalf of the Court:
1 Originality and interest of the subject: degree in that the proposal differs from the usual and the objectives of the project (and the obtained results potential) shall apply to routine clinical practice to improve patient care.
2. Methodological adequacy: coherence between hypothesis, objectives, methodology and work plan.
3. Quality in the interpretation and discussion of results (if it has results). Otherwise no rating.
4 Current and amplitude of the bibliography. Correct indication of references throughout the text and in the bibliography section.

5. Written expresion and grammatical correctness, if it manages to convey clearly the project (design, structure, bibliography).
6. Oral expresion and quality in the presentation in the form of slides and in general the documentary support.
- From the tutor:
1. Personal initiative, the proposed theme of the TFM, both in its development, based on the knowledge and skills acquired throughout the Master's degree
2. Design, development and description of the objective of the TFM
3. Development of a history of the project in the form of introduction and status of the scientific question raised. Analysis and interpretation of information and results. Drawing conclusions
4. Identification of sources and resources of information relevant to the selected topic. Use of software specific search of bibliographic information and its management
5 Organization and structuring of the content in the text during the drafting of the TFM
6. Planning of the work in an autonomous way throughout the development of the TFM
7 Integration, collaboration and communication with the team, including the tutor
8. Ethical Aspects. Ability to appreciate diversity and respect the ethical aspects both clinical and research throughout the realization of the TFM. In particular consideration and presentation of the project of TFM a Committee of clinical trials and Research Centre where it will be to carry out the project as well as evaluation and research funding bodies and committees

The final mark of the TFM shall consist of:
80% of the mark of the Court's defense of the TFM
20% of the mark of the report and evaluation of the tutor of the TFM

The qualification will be awarded according to the average of the items with the following numerical scale from 0 to 10. Therefore, both the qualification of the tutor and the Court must be numeric so it can calculate the weighting between the Court and the tutor.
The final mark will be qualitative (art. 10 RR 11-04-07), after the application of the following scale: 0 - 4.9: suspense (SS). 5.0-6.9: approved (AP). 7.0-8.9: remarkable (NT). 9.0-10: excellent (SB).

Correction criteria

The copy or shared work will be very negatively evaluated, and search systems for unauthorized copies will be used. Each work must be the reflection of autonomous work.

Staff: FINAL MASTER'S PROJECT

General competencies

Specific competencies

Objectives (Learning outcomes)

Lecture topics

Teaching units

Course contents

Basic bibliography

Complementary bibliography

Links

Software

Methodology

Grading

Correction criteria